Film 86
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kD1EpW ... p=drivesdk
Search found 320 matches
- Fri Sep 08, 2023 6:51 pm
- Forum: Video Production
- Topic: Film #86 test version
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1790
- Thu Jun 15, 2023 7:02 pm
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Questionable Pronouncements of the U.S. Executive Branch
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3709
Questionable Pronouncements of the U.S. Executive Branch
Analyzing
Questionable Pronouncements
of the U.S. Executive
Branch Regarding
Taiwan's Sovereign
Status
Questionable Pronouncements
of the U.S. Executive
Branch Regarding
Taiwan's Sovereign
Status
- Sun Jun 11, 2023 5:24 pm
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Japanese "50 year" occupation of Taiwan
- Replies: 1
- Views: 629
Re: Japanese "50 year" occupation of Taiwan
If occupation, like Manchukuo, then "occupation ends, sovereignty reverts to China."
- Sun Jun 11, 2023 4:40 pm
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Japanese "50 year" occupation of Taiwan
- Replies: 1
- Views: 629
Japanese "50 year" occupation of Taiwan
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2001/09/09/0000102166 https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2013/07/29/2003568397 https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/07/24/2003568016 https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2005/08/16/2003267914 https://www.ta...
- Sun Jun 11, 2023 8:47 am
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2014
Re: Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
The above data was moved to sov-jima.docx
- Thu Jun 08, 2023 9:33 am
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2014
Re: Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
Two Allies Fight for Iwo Jima Let us suppose that the in Battle for Iwo Jima, the United States called on the Soviet Union to participate. Military forces from the United States and the Soviet Union were fighting together in the Pacific, and after several days of heavy aerial and naval bombardments,...
- Wed Jun 07, 2023 7:21 pm
- Forum: Historical Notes
- Topic: Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2014
Iwo Jima and Evolutionary Theory of Statehood
Evolutionary Theory of Statehood Before considering this Theory and its relationship to Taiwan, let us first present the following imagined scenario as an INTRODUCTION to this topic. Scenario #2 - Allied forces comprised of two countries: Let us suppose that the in Battle for Iwo Jima, the United St...
- Sat May 20, 2023 11:47 am
- Forum: Video Production
- Topic: New videos needed
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1902
Re: New videos needed
= = = = = = = Eleventh Item = = = = = = = Excerpts from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Taiwan Therefore, only a military occupation of Taiwan began on 25 October 1945, and both the Treaty of San Francisco and Treaty of Taipei hold legal supremacy over the surrender instrument. These treat...
- Sat May 13, 2023 11:16 am
- Forum: Video Production
- Topic: New videos needed
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1902
Re: New videos needed
= = = = = = = Tenth Item = = = = = = =
Article 6 SFPT
But Taiwan has been separated from Japan, so no longer part of Japan.
Also, Gen. Order no. 1 was cancelled. Therefore after late April 1952, it cannot serve as a legal reference.
Article 6 SFPT
But Taiwan has been separated from Japan, so no longer part of Japan.
Also, Gen. Order no. 1 was cancelled. Therefore after late April 1952, it cannot serve as a legal reference.
- Sun May 07, 2023 10:46 pm
- Forum: Video Production
- Topic: New videos needed
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1902
Re: New videos needed
= = = = = = = Ninth Item = = = = = = =
SFPT did not cede Taiwan to China, but T.T. did
Otherwise why did T.T. specify that Taiwan residents are ROC citizens
If recognizing T.T. then automatically recognizing SFPT
Two parties to T.T., one ceded, one received
SFPT did not cede Taiwan to China, but T.T. did
Otherwise why did T.T. specify that Taiwan residents are ROC citizens
If recognizing T.T. then automatically recognizing SFPT
Two parties to T.T., one ceded, one received