DOD defense responsibility for Taiwan

Post Reply
Message
Author
Hartzell
Site Admin
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 9:15 am

DOD defense responsibility for Taiwan

#1 Post by Hartzell »

movie sample -- https://youtu.be/apa12WSyuzs

_____ REASONS WHY THE DEFENSIVE NEEDS OF TAIWAN ( . . . . ) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNITED STATES


1. Under customary laws and usages of war, dating back to the late 1700s (if not earlier) and the Hague Conventions of 1907, U.S. officials cannot recognize the surrender of Jap. troops in Taiwan Oct. 25, 1945 as "TW Retro. Day".

2. This date is the beginning of the military occupation. The US Supreme Court has recognized the "conqueror" as the legal occupier. ( . . . . case listing . . . ) In consideration that the ROC conducted no mil. attacks against TW in the WWII period, the USA is the legal occup.

3. The ROC is simply fulfilling the role of proxy occupying forces.

4. With the mil. occupation beginning 1945.10.25, the mass naturalization of local residents is void ab initio.

5. With the mil. occupation beginning 1945.10.25, the promulgation of a new set of laws (ROC Constitution) in occup. Taiwan territory is void ab initio.

6. With recognition that the promulgation of ROC Constitution in Taiwan is 100% illegal, there is no legal basis for the establishment of an ROC government structure on Taiwan soil.

7. With no legal basis for establishment of ROC government structure on Taiwan soil, there is no legal basis for the establishment of an ROC Ministry of National Defense on Taiwan soil.

8. With no legal basis for establishment of ROC MND on Taiwan soil, and in consideration that Taiwan is occupied territory, and mass naturalization was illegal, there is no legal basis for the implementation of military conscription policies over local residents.

9. With no legal basis for military conscription (and relevant laws regulating same), there is no participation by local residents in ROC army, navy, airforce, marines, etc.

10. Neither the post-war SFPT or TT awarded Taiwan to China. However, the SFPT clearly recognized the USA as the "legal occupier" (i.e. "principal occupying power). Under such circumstances, similar to occupied Cuba, the defensive needs of Taiwan are the responsibility of the USA.

Superior command responsibility, military jurisdiction, military government . . . . .

Post Reply